iPhone 6S Charging Dock/Port Connector Headphone Jack w/Tools NEW

Tech Repair Lab
(14005)
Registered as a business seller
£7.93
ApproximatelyEUR 9.02
Condition:
New
More than 10 available42 sold
This one's trending. 42 have already sold.
People are checking this out. 3 have added this to their Watchlist.
Postage:
£12.95 (approx EUR 14.74) Royal Mail International Tracked.
Located in: Dewsbury, West Yorkshire, United Kingdom
Due to US customs policies, the buyer of this item will need to pay import fees to the postal courier prior to delivery. Learn more
Import fees:
Import fees due prior to delivery
Delivery:
Estimated between Fri, 14 Nov and Wed, 26 Nov
Estimated delivery dates - opens in a new window or tab include seller's dispatch time, origin postcode, destination postcode and time of acceptance and will depend on delivery service selected and receipt of cleared paymentcleared payment - opens in a new window or tab. Delivery times may vary, especially during peak periods.
Seller dispatches within 1 day after receiving cleared payment.
Returns:
60 days return. Seller pays for return postage.
Payments:
    Diners Club

Shop with confidence

eBay Money Back Guarantee
Get the item you ordered or your money back. Learn moreeBay Money Back Guarantee - opens new window or tab
Seller assumes all responsibility for this listing.
eBay item number:142683836698
Last updated on 14 Oct, 2025 13:29:14 BSTView all revisionsView all revisions

Item specifics

Condition
New: A brand-new, unused, unopened and undamaged item in original retail packaging (where packaging ...
Compatible Brand
For Apple
Brand
Tech Repair Lab
Type
Charging/Lightning Port/Microphone/Headphone Jack, Adhesive, Antenna, Assembly Kit, Audio Jack
Compatible Model
For iPhone 6s
MPN
Does Not Apply
To Fit Brand
Apple
Colour
Light Grey
EAN
0700615650576
Category

Item description from the seller

Seller business information

I certify that all my selling activities will comply with all EU laws and regulations.

About this seller

Tech Repair Lab

97.2% positive Feedback49K items sold

Joined Mar 2006
Registered as a business seller

Detailed seller ratings

Average for the last 12 months
Accurate description
4.8
Reasonable postage cost
5.0
Delivery time
4.9
Communication
4.9

Popular categories from this shop

Seller Feedback (14,550)

All ratingsselected
Positive
Neutral
Negative
  • j***j (15)- Feedback left by buyer.
    Past month
    Verified purchase
    The seller sent out the item . Upon receiving the item , we realised it was the incorrect model . I informed the seller and requested the return. The seller ignored me for the beginning, until I enquired why am I being ignored , then the seller made up excuses. My return started . I packed the item back in the same packing and sent it back . The seller has deducted money from my transaction, partial refund. . This seller is up to no good. I have reported to eBay . The item is new I believe.
  • d***d (1752)- Feedback left by buyer.
    Past 6 months
    Verified purchase
    Rapid delivery, well packaged, great value, highly recommended seller ⭐️⭐️⭐️⭐️⭐️ Thanks.
  • 1***v (944)- Feedback left by buyer.
    Past 6 months
    Verified purchase
    Warning: Misleading Listing – Not OLED as Advertised This seller’s listing clearly states OLED in the title and description, but what they actually send is a cheaper Incell LCD screen. When questioned, they admitted they no longer sell OLED but haven’t updated the listing. That’s false advertising. Don’t be fooled by the low price — you’re not getting what’s promised. Avoid unless you want to deal with returns and excuses.
    Reply from: aras298- Feedback replied to by seller aras298.- Feedback replied to by seller aras298.
    The title says LCD OLED. We no longer sell the OLED ones due to their high costs and the LCD ones are the most popular and good value for money ones we have now. We do mention this in the description. There's no false advertising as Ive had this listing on for a few years and have had many happy customers. If it was not clear then a quick email to us would have clarified it.
See all Feedback