|Listed in category:
Have one to sell?

12PCS Set Invisible Ring Size Clip Guard Resizer Reducer Adjuster Tightener Tool

Condition:
New with tags
More than 10 available / 125 sold
Price:
£2.53
ApproximatelyEUR 2.95
Postage:
Doesn't post to United States. See detailsfor postage
Located in: Guangzhou, China
Delivery:
Varies
Returns:
30 days return. Buyer pays for return postage. See details- for more information about returns
Payments:
    

Shop with confidence

eBay Money Back Guarantee
Get the item you ordered or your money back. 

Seller information

Registered as a business seller
Seller assumes all responsibility for this listing.
eBay item number:284929462613
Last updated on 04 May, 2024 16:11:50 BSTView all revisionsView all revisions

Item specifics

Condition
New with tags: A brand-new, unused, unworn and undamaged item in the original packaging (such as the ...
Brand
Unbranded
Suitable For
Rings
Material
Plastic
Type
invisible ring size adjuster
MPN
Does not apply
Country/Region of Manufacture
China
EAN
6096806431203

Item description from the seller

Business seller information

guang zhou jie bo er wu jin gong ju you xian gong si
Liangfa Zhuang
bai yun qu yun cheng jie qi fu lu 31hao
467fang
510000 guang zhou shi
China
Show contact information
:enohP81308020881
:liamEmoc.361@7102pivtma
Value added tax number:
  • GB 367334971
I certify that all my selling activities will comply with all EU laws and regulations.
billiedreams

billiedreams

98.4% positive Feedback
61K items sold

Detailed seller ratings

Average for the last 12 months

Accurate description
4.9
Reasonable postage cost
5.0
Delivery time
4.9
Communication
4.9
Registered as a business seller

Seller Feedback (16,693)

9***3 (1553)- Feedback left by buyer.
Past month
Verified purchase
item as described and delivery was very quick packed well . definatly worth the money good seller will use again
e***h (278)- Feedback left by buyer.
Past month
Verified purchase
As seen
t***y (300)- Feedback left by buyer.
Past month
Verified purchase
Ace seller would use again ++++++++
See all Feedback